Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Paulsen on Giffords

 
Of several obvious alternatives, which is the ethically correct way to comport oneself?  That's a central theme you'll notice if you review my most beloved public scrapes, over the years.

And so today we here note:  Rep. Erik Paulsen has publicly called attention--multiple times now--to the great platonic intimacy he feels he shares with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

If you were severely disabled as the result of a madman's attack, would you like high-status people to publicly offer their love to you--and to publish photographs of themselves alongside pre-injury you? 

I don't claim to know which alternative thinking people ought to prefer--though I do hold that respectable opinion can encompass the view that it is reprehensible (of the high status love-giver) to engage in such behavior--as it cannot help but be viewed as political, when publicly broadcast.

And that, by the bye, is this writer's opinion--that it is disgusting when Rep. Paulsen preens on so.

The 2011 Tucson shooting was a great tragedy.  If public policy lessons are to be drawn from it, bring on the suggestions.  But let us take heed:  We live in an era that expects the crime victim to engage in public interviews after having been shot in the head.

A congressman gladly accepts a flattering supporting role in the made-for-tv remarkable recovery narrative.

To the dustbin!

Might it not be more dignified to keep one's statements to the Giffords in confidence?
blog comments powered by Disqus