Feminist apple polisher Jeff Fecke:
Wikipedia mentions two 'stains' on Sheen's character:
[1] 'In 2009, Charlie Sheen pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault.'
[2] 'As of March 1, 2011, Sheen was concurrently living with pornographic actress Bree Olson and model and graphic designer Natalie Kenly, whom he collectively nicknamed his "goddesses". Also as of March 1, police had removed Bob and Max from Sheen's home. Sheen told NBC's Today, "I stayed very calm and focused." This move came after, according to People, Mueller had obtained a restraining order. The document said, "I am very concerned that [Sheen] is currently insane." Asked if he would fight for the children, Sheen texted People, "Born ready. Winning."'
If Pieklo and Fecke believe Sheen is to be condemned for Item #2, why?
Sheen's ex-wife obtained a temporary restraining order against him--a restraining order which has since been lifted--and Sheen maintains an unusual domestic arrangement. So?
Perhaps Fecke and Pieklo believe Sheen is debased due to the granting of the recent restraining order. If so, it would be helpful for them to state their case; the mere existence of a restraining order does not prove Sheen is a threat to his ex.
If Fecke and Pieklo believe every person against whom a restraining order has been temporarily obtained should--in perpetuity--be considered a disgrace, I would like to review their specific argument. (It is not self-evident, is it?)
Perhaps their ire stems from the Bree Olsen angle. If Pieklo and Fecke believe that sex workers and johns should be barred from interacting with children, I would like to observe their reasoning. The world includes many sex workers and johns--and I'm quite sure many of them are capable of interacting non-abusively with children, no?
Perhaps Pieklo and Fecke find Mueller's insanity diagnosis--against Sheen, her ex--credible. An ex's charge of insanity does not sound sui generis, on its face--does it?
Or perhaps Pieklo and Fecke speak snootily of Sheen because Sheen enjoys fucking around.
Would they feel the same if Sheen were gay--and similarly enjoyed rough trade? Would they direct an equivalent attitude at Robert Mapplethorpe?
I wouldn't care--and therefore, I don't care if Sheen likes slippin' around. That would not move me to tweet in his dishonor--nor bar him from my ice cream social.
