Thursday, February 3, 2011

Hypothetical du jour

We have compared our opinions about the role of the political blogger, Jeff:

I think bloggers should discuss their social obligations in a more open manner--and would like to see bloggers question each other more often. 

You believe the blogger shouldn't feel any obligation to respond to public questions.  (Please correct me e'er I err, daddy-o.)

Were we to poll blog readers, which viewpoint would you expect to receive more support--mine or yours?

Jeff, what if a vain man severely rebuked you, without evidence--publicly calling you a racist, while sanctimoniously rescinding your right to respond, within his forum?

What would you predict my response would be--observing such a state of affairs? In the opposite situation, what do we already know Jeff Rosenberg's response would be?

BTW, Jeff:  A wonk, a techie, a nerd is a person steeped in research and data who finds questions of value and ethics troublesome-to-irrelevent.  Do I have that right?

In your recent response, Jeff, you at times descend into open disdain; I hope I have avoided any similar speech--toward you--as I consider it unseemly.  Your personal anger stems from your misunderstanding of my viewpoint:  I do not coerce other people, ever--and make no demands upon you. 

When you receive fair questions from a polite inquirer, I believe you feel social pressure to reply--though you deceive yourself if you feel that pressure coming from me.  Guess where it is coming from.
blog comments powered by Disqus